I can image it is a cool idea to use wave to discuss things. However I think for the moment, it is probably better to keep it in this (public) mailinglist.
For one, not everyone has an account (me included). One of the other reasons is that it keeps everything (including all the discussions) public from the start. And the mailinglist archive is also searchable by everyone ;) Hope this helps, Jeroen Janssen On Oct 4, 9:48 pm, Joe Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:11 PM, elliottcable > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I should point out, for anybody following this, that the discussion > > > has mostly moved to Wave… if you don’t have a Wave account, get in > > > touch with me, and I can bring your voice into the discussion there. > > > I'm still waiting for my invite to be processed by Google so I'd > > appreciate it if you could post a periodic update here. > > > I agree, I think that the discussion would be best served by having it in a > > widely accessible forum, such as this. > > From what I could see the discussion wave regarding this hasn't come very > far. > There seems to be interest in settling on an extension to XMPP, but there > still lacks any work on outlining what such a protocol should encompass. > This would probably be a good start. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
