Google Wave just moves way to fast for that to be useful... it allows us to collaborate instantly. To put an archive somewhere public would be useless, because things really do update *that* fast.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > > I searched, but couldn't find it - is it a wave thread? Unfortunately > not all of us have wave accounts yet... Could someone post an update > of that discussion here? Ideally, I think it would make most sense if > protocol discussions took place here - both for the wider audience and > to ensure it's archived together with other protocol discussions, and > findable from the wider web. > > My interested is in developing a thick client with good offline > capabilities, and am currently looking at xmpp for c-to-s. My aim > would be to maintain similarities to the s-to-s protocol where > appropriate, and diverge where usage will be different. > > Later, I'm interested in maintaining server-side contacts, shared > contacts, and other capabilities. > > I'm in favor of action over purely theoretical discussion - so believe > we should prove any c-to-s proposals asap through iterative > implementation, rather than delaying implementations until agreement > on a 100% complete paper protocol. > > All the best, > Dave > > On Oct 15, 12:34 am, Dale Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is a new thread for the discussion, created by myself and another > guy. > > it has been split into multiple threads and is better organised so this > wont > > happen and its more specific discussion > > It's called The new client/server protocol discussion, everyone in this > > group has access just search for it :) > > > > -- ~devyn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
