I don't know, I don't work there. (but I want to, don't we all? xD) On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Duong BaTien <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:38 -0700, Devyn Cairns wrote: > > All of the protocols will be, anyway, you can count on that. Google's > > wave client, the one seen at wave.google.com *might* become open- > > sourced. > > Great: > > Once this wave client becoming open source, there will probably be a lot > of activities from both Wave and GWT communities to learn best practices > from Google. Hope this will happen soon. Before the end of the year? > > Thanks > Duong BaTien > DBGROUPS and Budhnet > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Besides the server-server federation protocol and prototype > > releases, > > I'm very curious how much of the Google client-server protocol > > and > > Google client will end up being open sourced... > > > > > > On Oct 11, 12:10 am, John Poole <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've built the Google Wave Federation Prototype Server on a > > Windows > > > 2003 Server (using the OpenFire server) and found the DOS > > console > > > clients dodgey given the control codes DOS consuls cannot > > react to, > > > I've been working on several Linux boxes, one of which is > > the size of > > > > > a clenched fist and known as the SheevaPlug, > > see: > http://www.marvell.com/products/embedded_processors/developer/kirkwoo... > > > > > seeing how these might handle hosting a wave server. > > > > > > My interest is in the server area. > > > > > > Does the recent "beta" invitation/access of September 30th > > include any > > > more glimpse into the server code area? Is it basically an > > invite to > > > try client code against Google's servers only? Asked > > another way, > > > does the invitation allow one to connect to one's own > > server. I > > > gather from the discussions about protocols that protocols > > are still > > > under wraps. > > > > > > I'm just wondering if I invest more of my time on the code > > released > > > thus far within this group, "Wave Protocol", whether I'll be > > that much > > > ahead when the standards and codes are go public. I'm also > > wondering > > > if the access afforded by the invitation really provides any > > more > > > insight into the server/protocol issues. > > > > > > I really want to run some servers within my company's > > firewall and put > > > them to a stress test. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~devyn > > > > > > > > > > -- ~devyn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
