-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/23/09 7:32 AM, Torben wrote: > Having an RFC would indeed be great.
As an RFC author, I can tell you that we're a long way from an RFC. :) > There is a large discussion on the wave preview about the client/ > server protocol. > Unfortunately, there is much talk but little code so far (or I somehow > missed it) Protocols aren't code, they are specs that anyone can code to. For instance, that's how Google Talk implemented their XMPP-based service in the first place. > The current C/S protocol implemented by FedOne is insufficient and > must be extended anyway. > Other's argue to replace it completely with some XMPP-based solution. > > At least Google seems to have no time to specify a C/S protocol > currently. > They are busy with their federation protocol and web front-end. I've been busy, too, but I do plan to work on a c2s protocol by the end of the year. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrhs7QACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxdXwCff9IGH3uESTSScZJoTf0OJ9xP 9OYAn2rtXpG1gacnT6SKUW8Q/6OtJDAT =ZIrt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
