That is going to take having a bunch of implementations so we can explore the possibility space. The part that scares me is content editable. I'm considering writing something atop flash so I can use flash text engine. =/
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Anthony Baxter <[email protected]>wrote: > That's a concern a couple of people have expressed internally - it would be > good if there was some thought put into the c/s protocol, rather than just > standardising on whatever hack was already there. > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:39, James Purser <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:31 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: >> > Bear in mind it's not going to be an "official" client/server >> > protocol. Just less bad than the current one. >> > >> >> Understood, however for the moment, it's the defacto standard (being the >> only client/server protocol in operational existance :)), so any >> improvement is good news. >> >> >> -- >> James Purser >> Collaborynth >> http://collaborynth.com.au >> Mob: +61 406 576 553 >> Skype: purserj1977 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/purserj >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Anthony Baxter, [email protected] > > > > -- Brett Morgan http://domesticmouse.livejournal.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
