Actually, I don't think we will change the current FedOne c/s protocol significantly. In general, it seems like different c/s protocols can peacefully co-exist (as each is optimized to work against a different kind of client, and in the longer term we might get convergence in cases where the client platforms are sufficiently similar). We do plan to contribute another client/server protocol option which will be close to our current production version - once that has stabilized and we've teased out the bits dependent on Google architecture.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Sam Thorogood <[email protected]> wrote: > This is great! > > We have planned to update the c/s protocol for a long time - so it > might end up changing out from under you in the Java FedOne. I'm sure > there's some way we could probably provide backwards-compatibility if > we had to, though. > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:56, Torben Weis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> there is a new open-source wave server available written in C++ (I am a Java >> hater). >> Don't ask me why exactly I did this, but now it's there :-) You can find it >> in the QWaveClient svn (http://code.google.com/p/qwaveclient/) in the >> 'waveserver' folder. The server offers the same Client/Server protocol as >> FedOne. Thus, you can use it with FedOne console client or (of course) >> QWaveClient. >> The server supports OT (it uses the OT code from QWaveClient). I tested it a >> bit with QWaveClient and it seems that it can be used for waving already, >> but it is still rather untested. Currently it does not federate, but it can >> host multiple clients concurrently of course. >> So why should you care? Don't know. It might be a good starting point for >> C++ coders to work on a wave server and it might be helpful for wave to have >> more than one implementation up and running. I will use it for some >> experiments with a better Client/Server protocol. The FedOne development >> model does not lend itself to such a task at all and last not least did i >> mention that I don't like Java? >> Cheers >> Torben >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
