Maybe. I was going by the terminology in http://www.waveprotocol.org/whitepapers/operational-transform, but it lists anti-element operations, which are apparently nixed now, so I may be using out-of-date terminology.
On Feb 11, 8:14 pm, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you mean the "retain" operation? > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not entirely sure that I understand the point of the skip > > operation. I guess that it's used in order to get other operations to > > start at the appropriate place in the wavelet. But this isn't > > necessary if each operation has a position associated with it, right? > > Why is a Skip operation preferable? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
