Morgan/Markus - should be organise a group for this effort? I think a wave client for Android would be useful for a few people, so it makes sense to pool resources.
On Apr 16, 5:11 pm, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I've also considered doing OT on the server as a fallback, if a > client only solution doesn't work. I wasn't are that you can create > agent proxies on AE though. Always thought you had to roll your own > (FedOne) server for this kind of thing. > > -markus > > On Apr 14, 11:07 pm, dario <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > A couple of android wave client projects seem > > abandoned:http://code.google.com/p/wavedroidhttp://code.google.com/p/iwaveandro... > > > If performance is the reason we haven't seen android clients, one > > approach would be to use an agent proxy on AE that would provide a > > protobuf feed to Android. One should however guess that Google is > > working on a official client (most likely providing a protobuf > > interface directly), but if anyone wants to tackle this let me know > > and I can help test with my android phones. > > > -Dario > > > On Apr 14, 5:40 am, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 14, 9:04 am, Brett Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:> I'd > > > expect javascript and java to be roughly equivalent power on > > > > android, both are byte code interpreters. Unless someone got around to > > > > squeezing a arm jit into one of them... > > > > Java JIT seems to be on the > > > agenda:http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/jit-compiler-androids-... > > > (I think there are custom ROMs that already include it in beat/ > > > wahtever form). > > > > > On the upside, pushing OT into android would save you having to port > > > > the algo. If only I had an android device to play with... (the android > > > > simulated android web browser fell over big time when i fed it wave =) > > > > So porting the text only client over to Android might be worth a > > > try... Don't have a real device either, but probably can borrow one > > > for a weekend :) > > > > -markus > > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Markus > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Brett, > > > > > > thanks for your reply. > > > > > As far as c++ implementations go, I know about qwaveclient, but it > > > > > depends on QT, so doesn't sound like the best solution for Android. > > > > > On the other hand, the web interface seems to work on android phones > > > > > and it uses JavaScript which at least in theory should be even slower > > > > > than a Java Implementation. Or would it generally be a better idea to > > > > > do OT on the server for mobile phones? > > > > > > -markus > > > > > > On 13 Apr., 01:17, Brett Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Markus, > > > > > >> Given the nature of Dalvik, you may almost need to go native on the > > > > >> OT > > > > >> proto impl to get decent speed out of Wave on the android devices. I > > > > >> believe a couple of people were working on c++ implementations? > > > > > >> brett > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Markus > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > Hi- > > > > > >> > I'm currently working on a special purpose wave client and have > > > > >> > been > > > > >> > wondering if anyone has created an Android client that interfaces > > > > >> > with > > > > >> > FedOne? (Or an Android client that utilizes the wave protocol in > > > > >> > any > > > > >> > way?) > > > > >> > Even something as simple as a text only client, like the command > > > > >> > line > > > > >> > client that comes with FedOne? Or are there some obvoius obstacles > > > > >> > that prevent such a thing, which I simply don't see? > > > > > >> > Thanks for any insight, > > > > > >> > -markus > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > >> > Groups "Wave Protocol" group. > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> > [email protected]. > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > [email protected]. > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group > > > > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Brett Morganhttp://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "Wave Protocol" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > Brett Morganhttp://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
