So if I understand your reply correctly, follower actually IS a wave participant, but somehow he is not visible in list of participants (in wave list of wave detail at the top) until he contribute into wave, right?
> I think the best way of looking at a "follower" is as a participant who > hasn't actually done anything on the wave yet. As to groups, I'm thinking > they would be implemented via an agent (forwarding on to group members). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
