On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 03:02 -0700, lukas wrote: > So if I understand your reply correctly, follower actually IS a wave > participant, but somehow he is not visible in list of participants (in > wave list of wave detail at the top) until he contribute into wave, > right? > > > I think the best way of looking at a "follower" is as a participant who > > hasn't actually done anything on the wave yet. As to groups, I'm thinking > > they would be implemented via an agent (forwarding on to group members). >
I think that's the best way to look at it. Essentially, they're a participant who gets ignored by everyone else until they contribute. Basically it's like the wave is split into one room for the main wave and then a compartment for each follower with a one way mirror doing the seperating. -- James Purser http://wavingtheshiny.collaborynth.com.au Wave Addresses: [email protected] (wave.google.com) [email protected] (wavesandbox.com) [email protected] (collaborynth.com.au FedOne Server) Skype: purserj1977 GTalk: [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
