On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Daniel Paull <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, yes it does, but I can't agree with you. I still maintain that > the decision of which insertion point gets bumped when insertion > collide is arbitrary. If you think it's not, then I think you're > thinking about it wrong. > > Cheers, > > Dan
I agree with most points made in this thread. As Alex said, its really important that if a user goes offline and types something, their blip shouldn't appear in the middle of a wave. The decision of which way around the insertions happen is arbitrary from an OT standpoint, but its not arbitrary for users. Even leaving aside the google wave data model specific problems, when the same thing happens with text it feels wonky. I support the proposal, because little UX problems are important. But I also expect this won't be the last change to the protocol. Changing stuff like this will only become more of a headache (and have more pushback) until protocol versions are implemented. -J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
