On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:47 AM, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
> *I meant to say "because one GUI didn't get enough users" > Bit of a brain-hiccup there. > > "My personal belief is that we will see a "son of wave" (or "daughter > of > wave" if you are so inclined) in the coming years. It will, however, > look > very different. " > > maybe. > But my fear a bit is by then the whole planet might be on Facebook, > and no real room for a more distributed alternative. > Do you remember AOL? > The most exciting bit about wave for me was the prospect of the > federation, and sadly that was the bit more unfulfilled. (save for a > few amateur Fed1 servers) > It was too complicated. > On Aug 5, 1:26 am, Guillermo Rauch <[email protected]> wrote: > > The rich text editor and the XML-compliant OT implementation are amazing > > treasures the project left behind. > > Good luck to the GWave team in whatever adventure they partake next. > > > > -- > > Guillermo Rauchhttp://devthought.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- Brett Morgan http://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
