On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, jesus salas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think is not possible to run federation without OT > > But.... what is the problem with OT? > > I totally agree (although I do not know OT enough). I don't think I'd be able to write a PCRE engine, and yet I use PCRE libraries daily in several languages. If the OT is well implemented and provides a clear API in various languages, I don't see what is the problem with using it. Raphaël > If function is well-defined is not complicate to implement.... > > What is really need is clear specs all people can follow, that's all > > Jesus Salas > wave-vs.net > > > > On 6 ago, 18:05, antwatkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > So a couple of my thoughts on this thread. Apache Foundation is great > > provided Google wants to release control of code. If they do not, I > > like the idea of the consortium because it is a formal construct that > > can facilitate the pooling of resources, a consensus of > > recommendations, and can support sub groups that take on different > > aspects of the effort. Also, a consortium promotes more participation > > outside of developers and can be focused more on common protocols > > (whether it's for federation, OT, etc). As Ian from Novell mentioned > > they were creating a collaboration platform before Wave and they are > > interested in federation (but not necessarily just focusing on the > > Wave code base). A consortium may be a more natural fit for external > > organizations in this mold. > > > > I'm not sure what federation looks like without OT. I want to hear > > more on this. When I think of OT, I think less real-time and more the > > ability to guarantee convergence between multiple participants on a > > shared state via operations. As Patrick Nagel pointed out, sending > > around substantive copies of documents seems close to a source control > > system. So I am very interested in understanding how a non-OT > > collaborative federation would work. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
