Yeah, I've read all that now.
Guess we'll wait and see what time they allocate to open source and what
they end up releasing to us by the end of the year..
I'll continue to monitor this discussion list as I have been..

~Thanks.. Google Wave Team.

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From what the blog says, it will not be the same as the current Google
>> Wave Service..
>> I'd gather it'll lack the robot APIs, and potentally the embedding
>> APIs but what else?
>>
>
> Actually as the blogpost states we will work towards supporting the current
> Gadget, Robot and Data API.
>
> About the embedding API this is what Pamela Fox had to say about it [0]:
>
> There is no plan to support embedding in the open source plan, but it
>> should be fairly straightforward for a developer to modify the code so that
>> there is an output of the client that includes only the wave panel. (Our own
>> embed API basically did that-- just hid all the other panels).
>
>
>>
> Greetings,
> Lennard
>
> [0]
> https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%252Fw%252BgU9iRUfND
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>



-- 
--Matt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to