On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:07 PM, dougx <[email protected]> wrote: > 3) No user accounts .... > > Very curious how wave-in-a-box is going to address (3). > > Perhaps openid? > > ~ > Doug.
Bleh OpenID is really nasty to implement. Also, I think a wave server at example.com should only support users who can authenticate to the @example.com domain. Is (yet another) custom authentication & user database appropriate? (Perhaps configurable to use PAM, LDAP, etc for auth)? Does anyone know if we can the XMPP component protocol exposes the user database? -J -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
