I know why I haven't used Wave more often -- I simply didn't have the right contacts in. I remember sending invites, and getting only few people register.
On Sep 7, 1:38 am, Stephan Sokolow <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the problem is that Wave is, fundamentally, a "Jack of All > Trades, Master of None" platform. It tries to replace e-mail, IM, and > office suite groupware and doesn't obviously lend itself to any one of > those tasks well enough to market itself. > > Google could have probably mitigated that by working to clearly > demonstrate its usefulness in various use cases (eg. as a > collaborative brainstorming and writing tool), but I got the > impression they just said "Look at this cool thing we made! Help us > find uses for it!" > > Wave as a protocol is still useful... it just may need a variety of > more specialized clients on top of it to really shine. > > On Sep 4, 9:57 am, Alex <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think the reason for failure of Google Wave are these : > > > - Copying this ideahttp://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?WO=2005025177 > > (Sept. 2003) without knowing potentials behind it . > > > - Creating inhouse applications without knowing what was the reason to > > create such protocol in Origin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
