Yeah, I get one of two failures 1) No signature data found or it is invalid 2) Remote timeouts
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM, James Purser <[email protected]>wrote: > I believe that there have been cases of ejabberd being successfully > used in the past. > > However I'm running into troubles when trying to federate with > wavesandbox at the moment as well (using prosody). Packets are being > sent but nothing is being returned. > > James > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just wondering.. Has anybody has successfully federated wavesandbox > (while > > it is still online) with this server implementation of XMPP? > > The guide from their website says to disable signature verification (this > > appears to be where the trouble is) now I know that will not with > > wavesandbox. > > > > -- > > --Matt > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- --Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
