Is this with or without signature verification? The guide I found on the process-one website states to disable verification, thats why I ask.
2010/9/13 Mickaël Rémond <[email protected]> > Yes, we have successfully federated ejabberd with wavesandbox, both with > fedone and with our own wave server implementation. > > -- > Mickaël Rémond > http://www.process-one.net/ > > Le 13 sept. 2010 à 05:04, Matt Richards <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Just wondering.. Has anybody has successfully federated wavesandbox > (while it is still online) with this server implementation of XMPP? > > The guide from their website says to disable signature verification (this > appears to be where the trouble is) now I know that will not with > wavesandbox. > > -- > --Matt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- --Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
