On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Joseph Gentle <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you add a junit test for this, so we don't have another regression? >> > > Wouldn't that also require a whole system to setup a server that responds on > localhost or something? Yes it needs to be done, so that the console client, > webclient and agents can be tested, but are there resources for this effort?
Can't we use mockito to mock out almost all of the code? If its dependency injected, it should be pretty easy to make the relevant code modules talk to each other directly. Maybe I don't understand the code well enough,.. I certainly think there's value in adding tests though. -J > Greetings, > Lennard > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
