We are using prosody for acmewave.com without problems. (We had a bit
of trouble getting it working a few weeks ago until we discovered we
needed to turn off tls, by excluding "tls" from the modules_enabled in
prosody.cfg.lua.)

I see the same error in our prosody logs:

Oct 13 22:57:38 socket  debug   server.lua: client
74.125.155.125:clientport read error: closed

I don't know what it means but it's not keeping it from successfully
federating with wavesandbox.com.

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:37 PM, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting I think I've tracked down why I'm not getting anywhere with
> federating. I think it might have something to do with my prosody setup:
> s2smanager                          debug       First attempt to connect to
> wavesandbox.com, starting with SRV lookup...
> adns                                debug       Records for
> _xmpp-server._tcp.wavesandbox.com. already cached, using those...
> s2smanager                          debug       wavesandbox.com has SRV
> records, handling...
> s2smanager                          debug       Best record found, will
> connect to xmpp-server.l.google.com.:5268
> adns                                debug       Records for
> xmpp-server.l.google.com. already cached, using those...
> s2smanager                          debug       DNS reply for
> xmpp-server.l.google.com. gives us 74.125.155.125
> s2souta0c5378                       info        Beginning new connection
> attempt to wavesandbox.com (74.125.155.125:5268)
> s2souta0c5378                       debug       Connection attempt in
> progress...
> s2smanager                          debug       DNS lookup for
> wavesandbox.com sent, waiting for response before we can connect
> s2smanager                          debug       stanza [iq] queued until
> connection complete
> s2souta0c5378                       debug       Received[s2sout_unauthed]:
> <features xmlns='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams'>
> wave.collaborynth.com.au:tls        debug       Received features element
> s2souta0c5378                       debug       sending: <db:result
> from='wave.collaborynth.com.au'
> to='wavesandbox.com'>fc061a8ab61d8874ff02967012f354570be9d9bf11ac9f9f2337d58b5256842e</db:result>
> s2souta1aba80                       info        sent dialback key on
> outgoing s2s stream
> s2souta1aba80                       debug       Received[s2sout_unauthed]:
> <error xmlns='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams'>
> s2souta1aba80                       debug       </stream:stream>
> s2souta1aba80                       debug       sending: </stream:stream>
> socket                              debug       server.lua: client
> 74.125.155.125:clientport read error: closed
> s2souta1aba80                       info        s2s disconnected:
> wave.collaborynth.com.au->wavesandbox.com (closed)
> s2souta1aba80                       info        Destroying outgoing session
> wave.collaborynth.com.au->wavesandbox.com
> s2souta1aba80                       info        sending error replies for 1
> queued stanzas because of failed outgoing connection to wavesandbox.com
> stanzarouter                        debug       Received[s2sin]: <iq
> id='Eq36DJOUySkAAAAAAAAABg==' type='error' to='wave.collaborynth.com.au'
> from='wavesandbox.com'>
> componentmanager                    debug       iq stanza being handled by
> component: wave.collaborynth.com.au
> socket                              debug       server.lua: closed client
> handler and removed socket from list
> Note the error that is being returned:
> socket                              debug       server.lua: client
> 74.125.155.125:clientport read error: closed
> Anyone else working with prosody at the moment?
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Soren Lassen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the slow response. The certs for our acmewave.com instance
>> had expired and it took us a while to fix (the instructions at
>> http://www.waveprotocol.org/federation/certificates are horribly
>> broken and misleading, can someone who understands this stuff please
>> help fix them?) so we couldn't test it ourselves till now.
>>
>> I discovered one silly bug in RemoteWaveletContainerImpl which
>> prevented initiating contact from wavesandbox.com. The bug was fixed
>> just now in:
>> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?r=5276114aa6
>>
>> With this fix I was able to successfully add acmewave.com
>> participants, including [email protected]. Unfortunately, echoey
>> only runs for a short while (a few minutes?) until it disconnects, as
>> reported in issue 110:
>> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=110
>>
>> We need a fix for that...
>>
>> Soren
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, James Purser <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I've got collaborynth.com.au up and running but I have no idea if it's
>> > federating properly.
>> >
>> > I have [email protected] running though I'm noticing issues
>> > with echoey and updating the web client.
>> >
>> > James
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> While I've been testing Federation with sandbox, I am still getting
>> >> some
>> >> strange results. Is there another, more updated perhaps, server I can
>> >> test
>> >> with? Is there somebody I could collaborate with in real time, while
>> >> testing? Just want to make sure it not something on my end that is
>> >> causing
>> >> my issues with wavesandbox.com
>> >> Thanks
>> >> --
>> >> --Matt
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups
>> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to