Hrmm I thought I had, I'll have another look.

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Anthony Baxter <[email protected]>wrote:

> Something is wrong with TLS. If you turn off TLS, it should work again.
>
> Anthony
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 17:37, James Purser <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Interesting I think I've tracked down why I'm not getting anywhere with
> > federating. I think it might have something to do with my prosody setup:
> > s2smanager                          debug       First attempt to connect
> to
> > wavesandbox.com, starting with SRV lookup...
> > adns                                debug       Records for
> > _xmpp-server._tcp.wavesandbox.com. already cached, using those...
> > s2smanager                          debug       wavesandbox.com has SRV
> > records, handling...
> > s2smanager                          debug       Best record found, will
> > connect to xmpp-server.l.google.com.:5268
> > adns                                debug       Records for
> > xmpp-server.l.google.com. already cached, using those...
> > s2smanager                          debug       DNS reply for
> > xmpp-server.l.google.com. gives us 74.125.155.125
> > s2souta0c5378                       info        Beginning new connection
> > attempt to wavesandbox.com (74.125.155.125:5268)
> > s2souta0c5378                       debug       Connection attempt in
> > progress...
> > s2smanager                          debug       DNS lookup for
> > wavesandbox.com sent, waiting for response before we can connect
> > s2smanager                          debug       stanza [iq] queued until
> > connection complete
> > s2souta0c5378                       debug
> Received[s2sout_unauthed]:
> > <features xmlns='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams'>
> > wave.collaborynth.com.au:tls        debug       Received features
> element
> > s2souta0c5378                       debug       sending: <db:result
> > from='wave.collaborynth.com.au'
> > to='wavesandbox.com
> '>fc061a8ab61d8874ff02967012f354570be9d9bf11ac9f9f2337d58b5256842e</db:result>
> > s2souta1aba80                       info        sent dialback key on
> > outgoing s2s stream
> > s2souta1aba80                       debug
> Received[s2sout_unauthed]:
> > <error xmlns='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams'>
> > s2souta1aba80                       debug       </stream:stream>
> > s2souta1aba80                       debug       sending: </stream:stream>
> > socket                              debug       server.lua: client
> > 74.125.155.125:clientport read error: closed
> > s2souta1aba80                       info        s2s disconnected:
> > wave.collaborynth.com.au->wavesandbox.com (closed)
> > s2souta1aba80                       info        Destroying outgoing
> session
> > wave.collaborynth.com.au->wavesandbox.com
> > s2souta1aba80                       info        sending error replies for
> 1
> > queued stanzas because of failed outgoing connection to wavesandbox.com
> > stanzarouter                        debug       Received[s2sin]: <iq
> > id='Eq36DJOUySkAAAAAAAAABg==' type='error' to='wave.collaborynth.com.au'
> > from='wavesandbox.com'>
> > componentmanager                    debug       iq stanza being handled
> by
> > component: wave.collaborynth.com.au
> > socket                              debug       server.lua: closed client
> > handler and removed socket from list
> > Note the error that is being returned:
> > socket                              debug       server.lua: client
> > 74.125.155.125:clientport read error: closed
> > Anyone else working with prosody at the moment?
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Soren Lassen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for the slow response. The certs for our acmewave.com instance
> >> had expired and it took us a while to fix (the instructions at
> >> http://www.waveprotocol.org/federation/certificates are horribly
> >> broken and misleading, can someone who understands this stuff please
> >> help fix them?) so we couldn't test it ourselves till now.
> >>
> >> I discovered one silly bug in RemoteWaveletContainerImpl which
> >> prevented initiating contact from wavesandbox.com. The bug was fixed
> >> just now in:
> >> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?r=5276114aa6
> >>
> >> With this fix I was able to successfully add acmewave.com
> >> participants, including [email protected]. Unfortunately, echoey
> >> only runs for a short while (a few minutes?) until it disconnects, as
> >> reported in issue 110:
> >> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/detail?id=110
> >>
> >> We need a fix for that...
> >>
> >> Soren
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:28 PM, James Purser <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I've got collaborynth.com.au up and running but I have no idea if
> it's
> >> > federating properly.
> >> >
> >> > I have [email protected] running though I'm noticing issues
> >> > with echoey and updating the web client.
> >> >
> >> > James
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> While I've been testing Federation with sandbox, I am still getting
> >> >> some
> >> >> strange results. Is there another, more updated perhaps, server I can
> >> >> test
> >> >> with? Is there somebody I could collaborate with in real time, while
> >> >> testing? Just want to make sure it not something on my end that is
> >> >> causing
> >> >> my issues with wavesandbox.com
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> --
> >> >> --Matt
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> >> Groups
> >> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Wave Protocol" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Anthony Baxter, [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to