Membership control can be done through DigestBotty + Google Groups (or whatever form groups take in WiaB). And presumably once WiaB is more finished it will have a search panel that can be modded to show more lines.
On Thursday, October 21, 2010, dougx <[email protected]> wrote: > yup, the wave api group moved into wave using the group robot, but it > wasn't really a great success; no digested feeds, no membership > controls, no ratings system, no good search tools (title + 1 line vs. > groups search with title + about 8 lines), and problematically new > people would post to the group instead of using wave despite how well > sign posted it was. > > That said, once wiab is usable, I 100% agree that using it is the best > way to find bugs / missing features / things you want is to use it, > and turning it into a good groups discussion alternative would go a > long way towards raising its profile and getting broad adoption... > > ~ > Doug. > > On Oct 22, 7:19 am, Joseph Gentle <[email protected]> wrote: >> Heh, I've been wanting that for a long while :) >> >> Wave sandbox wouldn't be the right place for it. We make no guarantees >> that wave sandbox data will persist. >> >> Wave.google.com would be better, however that would require everybody >> on this list to use gmail addresses. If federation were enabled on >> wave.google.com, they could use @google addresses. But its unlikely >> that will happen any time soon. >> >> I think a better option is to move the discussion to wave in a box, >> once we've got wiab working enough. (Should be very soon now). >> Actually using wave-in-a-box on a daily basis will make us developers >> aware of all the annoying problems it has, and motivate us to fix >> them. >> >> -J >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Vega <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I don't know if this was already proposed, but it would be very nice >> > to move the forum into wavesandbox instance. The wave environment is >> > so much better than this (text only) group. Ironically, participants >> > in this forum should be the first to agree. When Waveinthebox will >> > become mature and stable enough - all waves can be transfered to the >> > waveinabox dogfood server via federation. So why not? I just don't >> > understand. >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Wave Protocol" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
