WRT the test cases, my plan is to use a simple naming convention to split test cases - All GWT tests named *GwtTestCase - All "large" tests named *LargeTest - Everything else is just *Test
"Large" tests are slow (> 1 sec), or involve disk access, network traffic, etc. I'm going to start a rename change now. Later we could move to using Java reflection to build test suite builders, etc., but for now it doesn't seem worth that effort. Alex On 3 November 2010 18:39, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: > The libraries and default repositories in our code project are separate for > legacy reason we've been working to overcome. The libraries repo has > general, re-usable code and largely comprises code that formed the core of > Google Wave. The default repository has what was an "example" application > but we're now building out to be a very real implementation. > > While the separation of generally re-usable code from the specifics of the > WIAB implementation is still informative, I don't think it warrants the > overhead of maintaining a separate repository. We can express it in build > files, jars, etc. I propose we merge libraries into default. > > However, one thing we must resolve before doing so is to speed up the tests > in the libraries repo. The structure of the GWT tests there results in a > ~30m test cycle, and that's just too long. It should be possible to have > them run much faster by re-using the GWT environment, but last time we tried > something broke so we backed it out. Dave Hearnden also has some good ideas > about annotating and separating our tests into different classes based on > speed and size. > > Let's figure it out. I'd welcome some help from anyone with some GWT > experience. Meanwhile I'm going to continue cleaning up the build files for > maintainability. > > Alex > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
