On 11/17/2010 08:03 PM, Tad Glines wrote: > There's nothing wrong with XMPP, it's great for what it does. But, besides > the server discovery bit, > I never understood why the wave team chose to use XMPP in the first place. > Federation seemed to be > "wedged" on top of XMPP. It didn't seem very efficient. Raw sockets whould > have made more sense.
I believe Soren mentioned at the summit that one reason was that Google already had xmpp infrastructure in place, which made xmpp an easier solution for the team (I hope I paraphrased that correctly). /Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
