Myself either, but I can see it being practical in a similar situation to discovery methods 2 and three: a highly restricted network designed to give you simple web serving only. :)
On Nov 24, 9:22 pm, Dave butlerdi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On 24 November 2010 22:00, Ian Roughley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 11/24/2010 03:51 PM, Graham Simpson wrote: > > > Ok, that makes a lot of sense. I'm not sure of the need to have the > > > second and this discovery options, rather than just the dns record - > > > still, they don't detract from general operation for most users and > > > provide additional options for some situations, such as government > > > organisations with limited access to their DNS systems. > > > > Can I assume that an a direct-service http method, the same server > > > port/interface will host both the web client and the federation? > > In a very simple case, it could be, but I wouldn't make that assumption, > > it's not how we'd run the > > service. > > > Am I > > > also right in thinking that this will provide a websockets interface > > > for other clients - again on the same port? If this is the case, it's > > > another massive bonus for the http method, because it means all > > > communication with the server can be achieved on a single arbitrarily > > > selectable port! > > > > On Nov 24, 8:17 pm, Torben Weis <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > > >> discovery with HTTP federation is described here: > > > >>http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/http-based-fede. > > .. > > > >> < > >http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/http-based-fede.. > > .>Of > > >> course you can setup virtual hosts using standard HTTP techniques which > > >> allows you to operate multiple domains on one server or to re-route > > requests > > >> depending on the target domain name. It comes with HTTP for free so to > > say. > > > >> Greetings > > >> Torben > > > >> 2010/11/24 Graham Simpson <[email protected]> > > > >>> My questions are always dumb and obvious: Wave over XMPP used the XMPP > > >>> protocol discovery using a specific DNS record... Wave ov HTTP - you > > >>> haven't described how the discovy works for HTTP yet, or is that in a > > >>> document that I haven't read? Likewise, will this simply run over port > > >>> 80 like any other web service, or is there a defined 'wave' port? > > >>> Another nice feature of wave over XMPP is that you could have 5 > > >>> different services talking over the standard XMPP port because the > > >>> server directed the traffic to the right extension based on the > > >>> content - how does that work with regard to HTTP, for environments > > >>> with a single public IP address? (e.g. a home static/dyndns > > >>> environment) > > > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > >>> "Wave Protocol" group. > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog > > >>> legroups.com> > > <wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog legroups.com> > > >>> . > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > >> -- > > >> --------------------------- > > >> Prof. Torben Weis > > >> Universitaet Duisburg-Essen > > >> [email protected] > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog > > legroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- > Regards > > Dave Butler > butlerdi-at-pharm2phork-dot-org > > Also on Skype as pharm2phork > > Get Skype herehttp://www.skype.com/download.html > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > www.mimesweeper.com > ********************************************************************** -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
