Hi Drew, On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 01:41, Drew DeVault <s...@cmpwn.com> wrote: > > Here's an updated governance document for everyone to consider. Changes > from the first version: > > - Use wayland-devel instead of a dedicated mailing list > - Use Gitlab for reviewing new protocols > - Extend discussion period for governance amendments from 30 days to 60 > - Permit either 1 or 2 points of contact for a wayland-protocols member > - Clarify who's affected by the cool-down period after a failed > membership removal vote > > I chose not to change the wording of the xdg namespace definition, > despite Daniel's objection. I couldn't come up with a wording that I > think would make everyone happy - feedback welcome. Under Daniel's > proposed wording of "catch-all window management", a case is easily made > for wlr-foreign-toplevel-management: > > https://github.com/swaywm/wlr-protocols/blob/master/unstable/wlr-foreign-toplevel-management-unstable-v1.xml > > I expect this would be controversial. Or perhaps it wouldn't be, and > would fit into this namespace, but would just be NACK'd by some folks. > Depends on how strongly integrated desktop folks want to gatekeep the > XDG namespace. Thoughts? > > wayland-protocols governance > > This document governs the maintenance of wayland-protocols and serves to > outline > the broader process for standardization of protocol extensions in the Wayland > ecosystem. > > 1. Membership > Disclaimer: I did not read through the prior discussion - the volume was tad much :-(
What exactly is the goal of having membership? At the end of the day if a project proposes a protocol and is willing to tweak it based on community feedback - great. If they don't well - not much one can do about it :-\ Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
