On Wed, 21 May 2025 11:49:34 +0200 Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:43:09AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:03 PM Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr> wrote: > > > > > > I would suggest to drop the alphas/betas from the release process, ie. > > > go straight to RC1. The process would then continue as usual, with > > > weekly RCs. As a release manager this would help reduce the load. This > > > is also what I've been doing for Sway and wlroots for a very long time. ... > > > > That said, going straight to RCs for libwayland itself seems > > reasonable. But, do we even need those? Could we go straight to > > release since the churn is so low? > > I think it's better to start with skipping alpha/beta for now, so that > there is at least *some* testing before things end up in a release. This > is different from wayland-protocols, since they don't end up causing any > actual changes on people's system until servers and clients make use of > and ship them. I agree with Jonas, for what little I'm worth for this question nowadays. Thanks, pq
pgpCBGous7GBn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
