Hi Peter, > I have no intention to belittle anyone or present this > point in some controversial way but I have a very serious > problem with this methodological approach for web sites > analysis. There is a concept and methodology; we call it > "Information Architecture" which is what need to be > applied for web sites analysis and design.
I don't think anyone would advocate designing a site upon which the success of your business depends without going through proper planning stages, and IA design is one of those. However, when someone asks for a site check, they're asking for just that - a site *check*, for a (nearly) completed site. They're asking you just to make sure that you can read it, that it's not broken in whatever flavour of Netscape you use, that pink text on a lime green background doesn't set off your colour-blindness, or that - see the first couple of posts after Jac's request - your tables don't break up at resolutions you don't normally use. If you have a serious problem with us talking about each other's work, why are you subscribed to a web developers' mailing list? What did you expect here? Cheers Jon ____ � The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM � ____ To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version: http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub ________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________ You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
