This is an old thread, ie, we've talked it to death in the past -- we
never resolved it. We did a lot of experimenting, though!
We just live with it -- you'll soon learn whose addresses pop up when
you select "reply all" and whose doesn't. <shrug>
Kathy
Bill Houle wrote:
>
> At 04:51 PM 7/18/98 -0700, Cyberspace Publishing wrote:
> >I've noticed a discrepancy in how some of the messages come through the
> >list. Most of the time, the "Reply-To" has the list's address in it, but
> >occasionally, the "Reply-To" will have the 'sender's' address in it.
> >Unless I remember to look at who the reply is actually going out to, it may
> >go to either the list or to the sender. What is causing this and can it be
> >corrected to be more consistent? Thanks.
>
> The use of the Reply-To in lists is handled in various unexpected ways by
> both mail readers and listservers. These unexpected results are one of the
> main technical reasons why Reply-To-List configurations are not recommended.
========================
Kathy E. Gill
Business Process Information
425.234.2004 - 6X-JT
http://www.dotparagon.com/aboutgill.html
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." -- Ghandi
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
