On 26 Aug 98, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would tend to agree. Most of the web sites I do nowadays are 20-40
> pages. They're exactly those "in-between" sites you refer to. I'll still
> do a 5-10 pager, but they don't seem to take that much less time than the
> big ones. I develop a template and any graphics I'll need for the whole
> thing, then plug in any photos or text that's required.
Yeah, the sheer number of pages is not a determinant of how complex a
site is to design and code, but rather the complexity of any given page or
section of a site.
If a client gives me 500 nice clean MS Word files and says, "Convert these
to Web pages and link them together, one after the next", I can fire up
HTML Transit and probably have a first draft of all 500 converted pages
running by the next day.
If on the other hand the client says, "I need to access a legacy database
currently running on an old IBM mainframe, and allow customers to select
products from it which they can then order via a secure commerce
server"; that site may run to only a few "pages" as such, but will likely be
a lot harder to get operational.
-----------
Brent Eades, Almonte, Ontario
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Town of Almonte site: http://www.almonte.com/
Business site: http://www.federalweb.com
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
