Brett wrote:
> Andreas Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Jack wrote:
> > >I'd really like to like NS4x, but it consistently portrays itself as a
> > piece
> > >of shit on NT.
> >
> > The Microsoft Trial is a bit embarrassing for Netscape.
> Microsoft released
> > emails from Netscape engineers who complained that Netscape browser was
> > unstable and that the Microsoft browser was better and had
> better features.
> >
> > I have both browsers installed and I use both, but I mostly use the
> > Microsoft browser: more stable.
>
> Well, let's be fair. What they said was MSIE was more stable on
> Windows. And, since one of the things at issue is MS's refusal to share
> .dll specs and other crucial machine-level data with the market, this
> seems somewhat expectable.
Is that the reason why NS4x is unstable on Win, when you get right down to
it? Is that what the NS engineers say? If so, I guess there's only so much
we can expect from NS, eh...."it's not their fault - MS wins again". BTW,
NS3 was quite stable on Win, but I saw it crash Macs many-a-time. And I
think NS2 crashed Macs even more.
And what is the real reason that NS4.0x sucks up Win resources and doesn't
release them?
Jack
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
