http://www.infobeat.com/stories/cgi/story.cgi?id=2558418834-10f

06:30 PM ET 02/11/99

Web Search Sites Sued Over Ads

 Web Search Sites Sued Over Ads
 By EILEEN GLANTON=
 AP Business Writer=
           NEW YORK (AP) _ Estee Lauder and Playboy Enterprises are
aligned
 in a fight over their good names that could help chart the future
 of advertising on the Internet.
           In separate lawsuits, the perfume maker and the publisher say
 Web sites are improperly selling the advertising that is displayed
 when someone types in the company's name to search for an Internet
 site.
           Advertising linked to search words _ ``keywords'' in Internet
 parlance _ is a major source of revenue for Web sites, but the
 legality of using trademarked names hasn't been resolved in court.
           Estee Lauder sued the Web search site Excite last month in
 federal court in New York city, saying that such ads infringe upon
 its trademark, foster unfair competition, and constitute false
 advertising. The suit seeks an injunction barring the ads.
           On Excite's Web site, a computer user who types in words
``Estee
 Lauder'' gets a list of Web pages mentioning the company.
           Also displayed: A big banner ad for the Fragrance Counter
Inc.,
 a small online retailer of perfume and makeup. Fragrance Counter
 paid Excite for that ad, and for the link to Estee Lauder.
           Playboy Enterprises sued Excite and Netscape last week in
 federal court in California and took its complaint a step further
 than Estee Lauder. Playboy said the sites ``hijacked and usurped''
 its good name by linking it to ads for hard-core pornography sites
 that go way beyond the Playmate of the Month.
           Internet companies and lawyers are anxiously watching the
cases,
 which could set new precedents in the evolving world of cyberspace
 law.
           ``There could be major repercussions for Web companies trying
to
 make money,'' said Drew Ianni, an online advertising analyst for
 the Internet research firm Jupiter Communications.
           Keyword advertising sells for an average of $40 for every
 thousand times the ad is displayed. These ads now account for
 roughly 25 percent of online advertising revenues, which totaled $2
 billion in 1998, according to the Internet Advertising Bureau.
           Typically, a Web site will link generic words such ``car,''
to a
 Ford ad or ``recipes'' to a hot new cookbook. However, Ianni
 estimates about 5 percent of overall revenues come from sales of
 trademarked keywords.
           Earlier court decisions have generally given companies the
right
 to an Internet address, using their trademarked name. That means if
 Estee Lauder wanted to list its Web site as www.esteelauder.com, it
 could. (The company opted instead for www.elcompanies.com.)
           Keywords are the latest frontier. ``This is really the second
 generation of cyberspace law,'' said John T. Soma, a professor at
 the University of Denver's law school and a director of the
 Computer Law Association.
           Some lawyers say Estee Lauder may be able to mount a strong
case
 for its company name. But the cosmetics giant is also fighting to
 control the use of the words ``Clinique'' and ``Origins,'' two
 Lauder brand names also linked to Fragrance Counter.
           ``What if you typed in 'origins' looking for information on
 Charles Darwin?'' asked Gerald Jenkins, a Chicago lawyer. ``This
 case raises questions about whether the seller of a keyword will
 have to keep track of every possible use of that word.''
           None of the companies involved would comment on the suits.
           Estee Lauder does get some benefit from the advertising. A
small
 number of its products are for sale on The Fragrance Counter's Web
 site, at prices roughly equal to department-store prices.
           In the end, these newfangled cases may be decided on
 old-fashioned principles of trademark law.
           Judges will need to determine whether consumers are confused
by
 the ads, or whether the effectiveness of the companies' trademarks
 is being diluted.
           ``If they can show that that their name is being diluted by
this
 use, they could have a pretty good case,'' said John Delaney,
 co-chairman of the new media practice at law firm Morrison &
 Foerster in New York.
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 Join The NEW Web Consultants Association FORUMS and CHAT:
   Register Today at: http://just4u.com/forums/
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
   Give the Gift of Life This Year...
     Just4U Stop Smoking Support forum - helping smokers for
      over three years-tell a friend: http://just4u.com/forums/
          To get 500 Banner Ads for FREE
    go to http://www.linkbuddies.com/start.go?id=111261
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to