Dear all,
The problem of forking and re-join forces is always the same: How to
merge (technically).
Unfortunately I have no idea about what version of web-cyradm is the
base of xerxes, but I think it is a older version such as 0.5.4 or even
0.5.3. Additionally I did not investigated the differences between
xerxes and web-cyradm.
Merging diverted code is always a challenge, but I'm open to give it a
try if I get some help from Amin.
What is you optinion about it?
Thanks,
Luc
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
Does it make sense to include the http://xerxes.qwik.net/ changes in
Web-Cyradm? I sure like Web-Cyradm and the changes available in Xerxes
sounds great too. It seems like a great idea to combine efforts, but
maybe I am missing something.
--
Sincerely,
John Thomas
Hi,
I think Luc could answer your question.
Regards,
Leon
_______________________________________________
This mailing list is hosted and supported
by bit-heads GmbH | http://www.bit-heads.ch
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm
_______________________________________________
This mailing list is hosted and supported
by bit-heads GmbH | http://www.bit-heads.ch
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm
