> > Amin recently married and is taking some time off from work. When he gets > back, I am sure he would be interested in helping. > > The goals of Xerxes were; fully qualified user names, virtual domain > names, > and stability. Some useful features of web-cyradm were sacrificed to > achieve these goals. > > When Xerxes forked from version 0.5.4 some time ago, contributors to this > forum and web-cyradm developers contributed significant amounts of code. > Much of that code was never selected for inclusion into web-cyradm. There > was nothing wrong the rejected code, it just was not going in a direction > that interested web-cyradm. As Luc says, merging that code now may be > difficult. > > How many sites are running Xerxes? What is the interest? > > Curtis >
Hi, Actually I intend to move to the new server in 1-2 months and of course I would like to install the version which has some very useful features of xerxes, so I vote for "joining the forces". This web-cyradm (with some xerxes features) could give a nice push for using web-cyradm by open-source society :) Best Regards, Leon Kolchinsky _______________________________________________ This mailing list is hosted and supported by bit-heads GmbH | http://www.bit-heads.ch _______________________________________________ Web-cyradm mailing list [email protected] http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm
