On 30-01-2009, Ian Bicking wrote: > --===============1780478717== > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646d5c46749ac0461ba70c5 > > --00163646d5c46749ac0461ba70c5 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, William Dode <w...@flibuste.net> wrote: > >> Fine, i should definitely give it a try. >> >> If my app is not thread safe but respond in a decent time, can i benefit >> from a multithread server (for a socket problem) if i use a lock for >> every page like that : >> >> I use webob... >> > > If your app isn't threadsafe, you should use a multiprocess server. > mod_wsgi has options for this, and flup has forking options (you'd use flup > behind Apache or another server).
Yes, i also could use an async server. But i would like to identify (and reproduce) exactly the problem. I also use a lot of cached data in my app. Anyway i have to make it thread-safe... -- William Dodé - http://flibuste.net Informaticien Indépendant _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com