Hi, Armin Ronacher schrieb: > WSGI 1.1 as currently specified in XXXX would be pretty uncontroversial > on Python 2.x because of the str/unicode coercion that Python implicitly > applies and that this is basically the only change. Based on the table, XXXX is 2.0 now.
> That would be too many changes at the same time. We can specify WSGI > 2.0 at the same time based on XXXX Would be 3.0 then. > IMO WSGI 1.0 should just fix the small problem it has, and WSGI 1.1 goes > to unicode in both versions. Based on the table. 1.0 is 1.1 and 1.1 is 2.0. I hope that unconfuses my mail, but I'm pretty sure it did not :) Regards, Armin _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
