2009/9/20 Armin Ronacher <armin.ronac...@active-4.com>: > For that I would rather go like this: > > WSGI 1.0 stays the same as PEP 0333 currently is > WSGI 1.1 becomes what Ian and I added to PEP 0333 > WSGI 2.0 becomes a modified version of PEP XXXX > WSGI 3.0 like XXX but drops start_response > > > ... > >> 2. Do we skip WSGI 1.X completely for Python 3.X and go straight to >> WSGI 2.0 for Python 3.X? > Yes.
Except that when I meant WSGI 2.0, I meant without start_response. You instead bump dropping that out to WSGI 3.0, which is fine. Okay, you just followed up with those clarifications anyway. :-) Graham _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
