On 07/16/2010 12:07 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:

If you do that, one has to ask the question, given it is more convention than
anything, why it isn't just a x-wsgiorg extension specification

Yes, fine by me either way.

I just want to be able to say "this application can use Unicode paths when run on a server/gateway that supports <standardised feature X>", rather than the current mess of "you can have Unicode paths if you use one of the dozen different server-and-platform combinations we've specifically coded workarounds for".

And Clover
Web-SIG mailing list
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig

Reply via email to