At 02:26 PM 10/23/2010 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote:
Hi,
On 10/22/10 2:35 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
has said:
"""Hopefully not. WSGI could do better and there is a proposal for
that (444)."""
Just to give this some more context: I think WSGI (even in Python 2)
is faulty and we have the possibility now to fix it. Nobody in the
web community is really eager to use Python 3 currently as far as I
can see, so we have some extra time where we can actually introduce
some value in to web development on Python 3. An improved WSGI
specification could be a key to that.
If PEP 3333 is what we end up with, that is fine with me as well.
I don't think it's an either-or case. PEP 3333 just means that
there's a clear path to port WSGI 1 apps. If somebody wants to
champion a WSGI 1.1, a 2.0, and whatever else, that's great!
I'm really trying to step *down* from involvement in this; the only
reason I stepped up to do this now is because of the pending 3.2
release and the open question(s) over stdlib APIs that have to
stabilize in this release.
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
