On 7 January 2011 18:23, Alice Bevan–McGregor <al...@gothcandy.com> wrote: > On 2011-01-06 21:35:24 -0800, Jacob Kaplan-Moss said: > Other than mod_wsgi, are there any PEP 3333-compliant (or near-compliant) > components in the wild? Enough to bring a framework to life in Python 3? > What I see is the chicken-and-egg problem endemic with Python 3: developers > wait on upstream to port before they do, and upstream developers are either > waiting themselves or don't see the demand to port.
There is also uWSGI and CherryPy WSGI server. I recollect that Benoit may have started looking it over for gunicorn. Graham _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
