On 11 October 2014 01:56, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Robert. What I would suggest you do is reboot this whole effort. > > Go back and perhaps look at how the github repo you setup is structured and > make it more obvious how anyone can add their work into it in separate areas > of it as need be and not just as issues, if that isn't already clear enough. > Document exactly what you want people to do as far as adding anything there. > Find people who will work with you on making all this clearer and defining > any process. > > The next step is to make a more definite statement about the timeline for > this whole discussion.
Thanks for the process critique - I agree. I will put together such improvements in a little bit. I hadn't actually intended to go quiet - my intended next step was to collate the feedback we've had so far (and prompt you for some mod_wsgi orientated feedback). However, about 2 weeks back my Mum died, and that caused a rather big speed bump in the 'what I need to do' chore list, which still isn't over (but at least the crisis wise aspects are) .... > They may want to comment on what should even be addressed in any revisions > or extensions to the WSGI specification. In other words, don't limit this to > just HTTP/2 and web sockets support. Allow people to raise their pet peeves > about the existing WSGI specification so we can perhaps properly address > them this time. The whole ASYNC issue with existing WSGI applications also > should not be ruled out of scope as far as the comment period. > > Finally and hopefully, rather than people just complaining about things or > giving wish lists, they will present properly fleshed out ideas for how to > concretely solve ideas around ASYNC, HTTP/2 and web sockets. TBH I'd be fine with complaints and wish lists - got to start somewhere, and having a clear list of the places WSGI has not met needs would be excellent. One thing you could do, if you like, is to put a PR together for the wsgi-ng repo that adjusts README in the light of your feedback. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
