On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > FWIW I'm totally fine with you bringing together that PEP - as you say > its complementary to what I'm focused on (I believe I even suggested > you might want to do that).
Did you have any feedback on the proposal itself? I'm particularly counting on you to tell me if I've horribly misunderstood something important about the use cases or the requirements for the protocols themselves. I think that the "upgrade" model I've presented will enable you to happily design completely new API paradigms without having to figure out how to tunnel them through a maze of WSGI middleware, with the exception of having reasonable ways to present the incoming request as a WSGI request. But if I've missed something there, please let me know. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
