Yeah, the directionality needs to be specified more clearly here. Thanks! Cory
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:55, Michael Merickel <mmeri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure the "backward-incompatible" text in your proposal makes sense. I > think you actually mean to say that applications written to use new WSGI 1.1 > features will not work with WSGI 1.0 servers. That's obvious though by the > version number bump. I'd be very concerned, however, if my application using > only WSGI 1.0 features didn't work on a WSGI 1.1 server (which is what I > thought you were saying the first time I saw backward-incompatible in the > text). > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl > <mailto:dirk...@ochtman.nl>> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Cory Benfield <c...@lukasa.co.uk > <mailto:c...@lukasa.co.uk>> wrote: > > Please let me know what you think! > > I reviewed all the pull requests and they look good to me, save one > tiny nit that I left a comment for. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > _______________________________________________ > Web-SIG mailing list > Web-SIG@python.org <mailto:Web-SIG@python.org> > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig > <http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig> > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mmericke%2Bwebsig%40gmail.com > <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/mmericke%2Bwebsig%40gmail.com> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
