this is good, but it doesnt tell much, unless it is compared to other frameworks on your same machine.
Can you test django and others too? On Oct 25, 1:40 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run this test for web2py on a Ubuntu VM Machine running on the > latest PoweMac (the VM machine use one core only). I used the built-in > cherrypy WSGI server. > > ab -c 10 -t 60http://localhost:8123/benchmarks > > This is the controller action (applications/benchmark/controllers/ > default.py) > > session.forget() > def index(): > return dict(message="hello world") > > This is the view (applications/benchmark/views/default/index.html) > > {{=message}} > > This is the output: > > Total transferred: 10801080 bytes > HTML transferred: 2500250 bytes > Requests per second: 1578.29 [#/sec] (mean) > Time per request: 6.336 [ms] (mean) > Time per request: 0.634 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > requests) > Transfer rate: 332.93 [Kbytes/sec] received --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
