It's hard, if not impossible to do meaningful comparison of php and python _framework_ speed since the simpler the app (and hello world is as simple as it gets), the more the web server/interface tech will influence the result. So, even with web2py on it's own, you will see drastic differences depending on whether it's running as a CGI, cherrypy, mod_wsgi, mod_python, can it be precompiled, etc. On the other side, PHP uses technologies which you also would have to explore to make a meaningful picture, like mod_php versus fastcgi, mmcache style caching accelerators, etc. If you compared it to Django, TurboGears et al, it would be a much more lifelike comparison since they are 'the competition'. PHP frameworks might serve the same purpose, but are technologically pretty far (thus if you compare PHP, you might as well compare ASP, JSP and their kin).
On Oct 26, 5:49 am, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yarko is right. Moreover I do not like to publish benchmarks since > everybody assumes I am biased. ;-) > I am willing to help with benchmarks. > > Anyway by test was triggered by this:http://paul-m-jones.com/blog/?p=236 > > My test obviously run on a different machine but, nevertheless, it > gives an idea of how fast web2py is compared with php based mvc > frameworks. > > Massimo > > On Oct 25, 11:26 pm, yarko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think Massimo is spread thin, working on T2, T3, and conferencing > > project, etc. > > > Is someone willing to step up to this? Plan, suggest. It would be > > good to create a branch on launchpad in the web2py area for > > profiling / performance tests, and add a Blueprint there with your > > plans. If you want help registering a branch, I can help. > > > Regards, > > Yarko > > > On Oct 25, 10:29 pm, JorgeRpo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would be good haveing benchmarks of other frameworks from > > > php(codeigniter comes to mind) and ROR > > > > that would be really interesting... > > > > On Oct 25, 10:24 pm, JorgeRpo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > this is good, but it doesnt tell much, unless it is compared to other > > > > frameworks on your same machine. > > > > > Can you test django and others too? > > > > > On Oct 25, 1:40 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I run this test for web2py on a Ubuntu VM Machine running on the > > > > > latest PoweMac (the VM machine use one core only). I used the built-in > > > > > cherrypy WSGI server. > > > > > > ab -c 10 -t 60http://localhost:8123/benchmarks > > > > > > This is the controller action (applications/benchmark/controllers/ > > > > > default.py) > > > > > > session.forget() > > > > > def index(): > > > > > return dict(message="hello world") > > > > > > This is the view (applications/benchmark/views/default/index.html) > > > > > > {{=message}} > > > > > > This is the output: > > > > > > Total transferred: 10801080 bytes > > > > > HTML transferred: 2500250 bytes > > > > > Requests per second: 1578.29 [#/sec] (mean) > > > > > Time per request: 6.336 [ms] (mean) > > > > > Time per request: 0.634 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > > > > > requests) > > > > > Transfer rate: 332.93 [Kbytes/sec] received --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
