oh, i forgot, i can hide with css....

i'm going to try that.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Wes James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yarko,
>
> so far, i can get it to work if the checkbox fields are not hidden on
> the form.  My problem now is trying to make 'hidden' checkbox form
> elements.  I don't see any way to hide checkbox elements.
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Yarko Tymciurak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wes -
>>
>> I think we need a complete - if minimized example which others can use to
>> reproduce.  Can you provide?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yarko
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:15 AM, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> SQLFORM(...,fields=[...])
>>>
>>> should be used to determine which fields are expected and which should
>>> be ignored.
>>>
>>> For T2 use
>>>
>>> db.table.exposes=[....] # list of field names
>>>
>>> Massimo
>>>
>>> On Nov 21, 9:52 am, billf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Massimo
>>> >
>>> > I think there is a typo in your point 1) and it should read "update
>>> > form and it was *checked* in the original record".  The behaviour of
>>> > the setting the checkbox value is not in question.
>>> >
>>> > I believe the problem Wes originally raised is that a boolean field on
>>> > the database gets set to False erroneously if a form does not contain
>>> > a control for that field (either hidden or a checkbox).  This is
>>> > because web2py (any server-side code) cannot distinguish between an
>>> > unchecked checkbox and an absence of a checkbox.  So the missing
>>> > control is interpreted as unchecked/false and stored as such.  This
>>> > differs from other field types where a missing control can and is
>>> > interpreted as "no change".
>>> >
>>> > On Nov 21, 3:28 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > It was mentioned in one of the previous emails. I am not sure it helps
>>> > > with the current problem. I am not sure I understand the current
>>> > > problem.
>>> >
>>> > > checkboxes are always unchecked unless:
>>> > > 1) update form and it was unchecked in the original record
>>> > > 2) create form and corresponding field has default=True
>>> >
>>> > > Are you saying this is not the case or that I am missing something?
>>> > > I think this is the correct behavior
>>> >
>>> > > Massimo
>>> >
>>> > > On Nov 21, 8:49 am, billf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > Massimo
>>> >
>>> > > > In what way are you suggesting "SQLFORM and and FORM take a
>>> > > > parameter
>>> > > > hidden=dict(key='value')" would be used?
>>> >
>>> > > > Bill
>>> >
>>> > > > On Nov 21, 2:10 pm, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > Do you have default=False in the database?
>>> >
>>> > > > > SQLFORM and and FORM take a parameter hidden=dict(key='value')
>>> >
>>> > > > > Massimo
>>> >
>>> > > > > On Nov 21, 6:32 am, billf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > I am investigating a possible solution to the above problem that
>>> > > > > > would
>>> > > > > > return fieldname=OFF if a displayed checkbox is unchecked.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > This would enable web2py to retain existing values for a boolean
>>> > > > > > field
>>> > > > > > if a request.var was not present.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > However, I recognise that some people may consider returning
>>> > > > > > fieldname=OFF a contravention of protocol - does anyone feel
>>> > > > > > like
>>> > > > > > that?
>>> >
>>> > > > > > FYI the solution is to add a hidden "off" checkbox (value='off')
>>> > > > > > for
>>> > > > > > each displayed checkbox (both with the same name) and when the
>>> > > > > > normal
>>> > > > > > checkbox is clicked setting the "off checkbox appropriately so
>>> > > > > > that
>>> > > > > > whatever the status of the normal checkbox either name=on or
>>> > > > > > name=off
>>> > > > > > will be returned.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > Any thoughts gratefully received.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On Nov 21, 8:13 am, billf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > If the following explanation is correct it is a big
>>> > > > > > > coincidence
>>> > > > > > > because I have just been looking at this behaviour.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > When a form is submitted, if there is no parameter for a field
>>> > > > > > > then
>>> > > > > > > one of 2 things happen (simplified):
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > If it is NOT a checkable form control (checkable=check box or
>>> > > > > > > radio
>>> > > > > > > button) then the original form value is used.  In the case of
>>> > > > > > > an
>>> > > > > > > existing record, this will be the value in the existing
>>> > > > > > > record. In the
>>> > > > > > > case of a new record then any defailt will be used.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > If it IS a checkable form control then it is impossible to
>>> > > > > > > distinguish
>>> > > > > > > between a missing parameter and an unchecked control because
>>> > > > > > > CGI
>>> > > > > > > doesn't send "mycheckbox=off" - it just doesn't send anything.
>>> > > > > > >  So to
>>> > > > > > > be able to set a boolean field to false, web2py must say
>>> > > > > > > missing==unchecked.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > In your case, you set checkboxes on page2 and everything is
>>> > > > > > > fine.
>>> > > > > > > When you amend page 1 and submit, no checkboxes are present so
>>> > > > > > > web2py
>>> > > > > > > sets the associated fields to False. You go back to page 2
>>> > > > > > > and, lo and
>>> > > > > > > behold, all the checkboxes are unchecked.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > The only solution, given the current setup, is that any fields
>>> > > > > > > represented as checkable controls but not displayed in the
>>> > > > > > > current
>>> > > > > > > form must be set up in the form as "hidden" so that checked
>>> > > > > > > fields are
>>> > > > > > > returned even if they are not displayed.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > I think it should be possible to create the "hidden" fields
>>> > > > > > > automatically in SQLFORM/FORM, although supporting "custom
>>> > > > > > > forms" (where a developer may not include a field that the
>>> > > > > > > standard
>>> > > > > > > SQLFORM would include) could be a complication.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > On Nov 21, 6:20 am, "Wes James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > I have an app that on one page I have a set of fields (first
>>> > > > > > > > 20 fields
>>> > > > > > > > of say 50) I have manually placed.  All saves well and when
>>> > > > > > > > I go to
>>> > > > > > > > another page and come back all is well.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > On a separate page, I edit the rest of these fields.  Part
>>> > > > > > > > of these
>>> > > > > > > > are check box fields and some others including textarea
>>> > > > > > > > fields.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > When I save the data on this page - all is well.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > I then go back to the first page and make a change and save
>>> > > > > > > > the data -
>>> > > > > > > > fine, but if I go back to the page with the check boxes,
>>> > > > > > > > they are all
>>> > > > > > > > cleared out - I look in the DB in admin area and yes, they
>>> > > > > > > > are all set
>>> > > > > > > > to False.  But the textarea fields do not do this on this
>>> > > > > > > > page - they
>>> > > > > > > > keep their data just fine.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > So I created a test page and made a controller like I
>>> > > > > > > > already have:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > form=t2.create(db.student)
>>> > > > > > > > return dict(form=form)
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > and then in a test.html do {{=form}
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > I then save the page with a check box selected - fine - that
>>> > > > > > > > works.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > I then go back to my first page and make a change and save.
>>> > > > > > > >  Go back
>>> > > > > > > > to the test page and the check box is cleared.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > Why is it doing this?
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > thx,
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > > -wj
>>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to