Hi Massimo,
On Nov 27, 6:13 am, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anybody have any objection to this patch? I object, on the grounds that the URL standard does *not* support unicode. As Achipa points out, a unicode URL needs to be escaped in order to pass validation. If we want to support unicode URLs, rather than breaking web2py's standards-compliance, I suggest either extending IS_URL with a new "mode" that automatically escapes unicode, or creating a utility function that escapes unicode URLs (but leaves non-Unicode URLs intact). What does everyone else think? I hope that helps, --Jonathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
