My opinion is that we should adhere to the RFCs.
Daniel On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 13:12, Jonathan Benn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Massimo, > > > On Nov 27, 6:13 am, mdipierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does anybody have any objection to this patch? > > I object, on the grounds that the URL standard does *not* support > unicode. As Achipa points out, a unicode URL needs to be escaped in > order to pass validation. > > If we want to support unicode URLs, rather than breaking web2py's > standards-compliance, I suggest either extending IS_URL with a new > "mode" that automatically escapes unicode, or creating a utility > function that escapes unicode URLs (but leaves non-Unicode URLs > intact). > > What does everyone else think? > > > I hope that helps, > > --Jonathan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
