On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:22 PM, DenesL <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hmmm.... Looking at the code of IS_IN_SET, I don't see why not... am I > > missing something? > > Because sets are unordered collections of unique elements (unordered > is the keyword). > > Lets pass a set instead of a list: > sushi_opts=set( ['yes', 'no','unknown'] ) > > now if you display it you get: > set(['unknown', 'yes', 'no' ])
well - for this kind of use case, you wouldn't WANT to use sets, but as far as the class is concerned, it doesn't preclude it - should you want to use them. That's what I was thinking - that Iceberg's patch expands the scope and use of IS_IN_SET().... which you can (now) use sets, lists, or dicts with, whichever is appropriate for your use case. Cool! > > > and now they will not match the label order (you get the wrong option > for the label). > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
