I'm working from Version 2.3.2 (2012-12-17 15:03:30) stable
Here's the table in question (I've commented-out the custom_qualifier for
the string fields):
db.define_table('t_run',
Field('f_trial', type='reference t_trial',
label=T('Trial')),
Field('f_when', type='date',
label=T('When')),
Field('f_dog', type='reference t_dog',
label=T('Dog')),
Field('f_name', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Name')),
Field('f_breed', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Breed')),
Field('f_jump_height', type='integer',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False
},
label=T('Jump Height')),
Field('f_level', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Level')),
Field('f_class', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Class')),
Field('f_pref', type='boolean',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Preferred')),
Field('f_armband', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Armband')),
Field('f_yards', type='integer',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Yards')),
Field('f_sct', type='integer',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('SCT')),
Field('f_judge', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Judge')),
Field('f_score', type='integer',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Score')),
Field('f_time', type='double',custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Time')),
Field('f_faults', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Faults')),
Field('f_handler', type='string',#custom_qualifier={'indexed':False},
label=T('Handler')),
Field('f_order', type='integer',
label=T('Order')),
auth.signature,
format='%(f_key)s',
migrate=settings.migrate)
P.S. Turning off the indexes DOES make a difference; with the changes
above, instead of using up over 30% of my quota, I'm "only" using 23%. If
I can get the strings unindexed, and take out the web2py-supplied fields
(created_by & _on, modified_by & _on, and maybe is_active), that should get
it down to something manageable. (Not clear on how to handle the
web2py-supplied fields, as I don't know what parameters were using in
making them, making it difficult to know just how to "supply my own
definitions".)
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:24:21 PM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>
> your line numbers are off from mine so i'm having trouble making sense of
> this. :(
>
> can you send your model definition so i can see what you are working
> with? i think then i can line it up with the dal version i have here
> (which was trunk from HG as of saturday AM PST)
>
> cfh
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:18:13 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>
>> Sorry about that. I've fixed it, and now I get the following:
>>
>> In FILE: /base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/
>> applications/ppt_demo/models/db_wizard.py
>>
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/gluon/restricted.py"
>> , line 212, in restricted
>> exec ccode in environment
>> File
>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/applications/ppt_demo/models/db_wizard.py"
>> , line 198, in <module>
>> migrate=settings.migrate)
>> File
>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/gluon/dal.py",line
>> 7189, in define_table
>> table = self.lazy_define_table(tablename,*fields,**args)
>> File
>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/gluon/dal.py",line
>> 7225, in lazy_define_table
>> polymodel=polymodel)
>> File
>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365574604253984974/gluon/dal.py",line
>> 4368, in create_table
>> ftype = self.types[field_type](**attr)
>> TypeError: <lambda>() takes no arguments (1 given)
>>
>>
>> This only happens if one of the fields in question is a string; I get no
>> error when the unindexed fields are all integer, boolean or double.
>>
>> - Scott
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:04:12 AM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>>>
>>> it looks like you have a typo.... "custom_qualifer" vs "custom_qualifier"
>>>
>>> On Monday, February 25, 2013 6:44:14 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I applied the patch, and added custom_qualifiers like so:
>>>>
>>>> Field('f_name', type='string',custom_qualifer={'indexed':False},
>>>> label=T('Name')),
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and this is the error I got:
>>>>
>>>> In FILE: /base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365567821359373728/
>>>> applications/ppt_demo/models/db_wizard.py
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File
>>>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365567821359373728/gluon/restricted.py"
>>>> , line 212, in restricted
>>>> exec ccode in environment
>>>> File
>>>> "/base/data/home/apps/s~sbhweb2py/1.365567821359373728/applications/ppt_demo/models/db_wizard.py"
>>>> , line 165, in <module>
>>>> label=T('Name')),
>>>> TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument
>>>> 'custom_qualifer'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:30:48 PM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott,
>>>>>
>>>>> this is *completely* untested, but here's a proposal:
>>>>> - use the (undocumented) field.custom_qualifier property in GAE field
>>>>> definitions
>>>>> - if you want a field to be unindexed set
>>>>> custom_qualifier={'indexed':False}
>>>>> - for "properties that don't get listed explicitly"....override those
>>>>> default properties with what you want (there are a few techniques for not
>>>>> explicitly listing fields, depending on which technique you are using the
>>>>> answer here is different.
>>>>>
>>>>> this patch against HG trunk this AM might work (i say might cause i
>>>>> have not tested it). are you willing to experiment with it and let us
>>>>> know?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> christian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, February 22, 2013 3:53:33 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I had to guess, I'd say a patch is needed in the loop over the
>>>>>> fields in create_table, that would add a new entry to the dict for the
>>>>>> field definition based on a new attribute (which would be ignored for
>>>>>> anything other than Google's Datastore) which gets added to sql_fields;
>>>>>> then migrate_table, which seems to build the table building/altering
>>>>>> commands would need to be made to recognize the new entry & add the
>>>>>> disable
>>>>>> index command. There's not a lot of comments in the code, and I'd be
>>>>>> afraid to break something, but might give it a try.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. Not sure of the best way to handle this (what's describe above
>>>>>> wouldn't handle it), but it would be nice to be able to turn off the
>>>>>> indexes for the fields that don't get listed explicitly in models.db
>>>>>> (things like created by & when, modified by & when).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, February 22, 2013 6:14:28 PM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for the link. i'll try and take a look this weekend and see
>>>>>>> if there is a place for that in the DAL (feel free to open
>>>>>>> gluon/dal.py
>>>>>>> yourself too).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yup, i'm paying more for writes right now then i am for instance
>>>>>>> hours per day on my largest paid application. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cfh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:59:06 PM UTC-8, Scott Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> According to
>>>>>>>> https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/datastore/indexes#Unindexed_Properties,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You declare a property unindexed by setting indexed=False in the
>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>> constructor".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One incurs the cost of a write (or 2?) for every property of a
>>>>>>>> record that gets written; so, for a table with about 25 fields (once
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> include all of the ones web2py adds), inserting 300 records incurs the
>>>>>>>> cost
>>>>>>>> of 14K+ writes; as the free account has a limit of 50K writes per day,
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> is rather limiting. It is easy to turn such indicies back on, but you
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> to re-write every record in order to repopulate them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Scott
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:51:59 PM UTC-5, howesc wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i'm being lazy here....do you have the instructions (or link to
>>>>>>>>> instructions) from GAE for disabling indexes? i don't have it handy
>>>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>>>> now....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> we can check if the DAL has a secret way to handle it, and/or
>>>>>>>>> create a patch to allow it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> may i ask what advantage you are hoping to achieve by skipping
>>>>>>>>> those indexes? i've left them on for fear of making a bad choice
>>>>>>>>> that i
>>>>>>>>> can't revert.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:56:07 AM UTC-8, Scott Hunter
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I understand it, the GAE datastore will automatically create
>>>>>>>>>> an index for every field of every table (to facilitate queries using
>>>>>>>>>> single
>>>>>>>>>> fields); those requiring multiple fields also get generated, but
>>>>>>>>>> will get
>>>>>>>>>> added to index.yaml by the SDK when tested locally. Since these are
>>>>>>>>>> created outside of the DAL, I wouldn't expect to be able to remove
>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>> using it. I also understand that there is a way, with the GAE SDK,
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> disable the index for any given field (by a parameter in the field
>>>>>>>>>> definition); is there any way to accomplish this through the DAL,
>>>>>>>>>> and if
>>>>>>>>>> so, what is it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
